what is the dissimilarities of neutralization theory and drift theory in Criminolgy? please answer it.

Neutralization and Drift Theory proposes that juveniles sense an obligation to the law. This obligation to the law remains in place most of the time. However, when this obligation is strained, juvenile delinquents tend to drift into crime. This strain is best explained by Sykes and Matza's example of justified theft.

Explanation:

pa brainly po

Answer Link

JOHNPATRICKDESOLOCGO JOHNPATRICKDESOLOCGO · Answer 2

Answer:

Neutralization theory was developed in 1957 by Dr. Gresham Sykes and his former student, Dr. David Matza. Their theory presented a different perspective on social control which was first explained by Edwin Surtherland in 1947 through his Learning Theory. Dr. Matza felt rational choice was being left out and developed the Neutralization and Drift Theory to help explain why delinquents drift in and out of delinquency. If these other theories - biological, psychological, or sociological - were correct, how would a person be able to explain the fact that most juvenile delinquents move away from crime by the time they hit their early twenties? Dr. Matza felt, “that if delinquents had established a subculture with norms that differ from those of the larger society, they would not have exhibited shame or guilt when violating the social order.”{C} (Matza D. a., Neutralization Theory: Learning Rationlizations as Motives, 2004){